Two Ways of Communication

Two Ways of Communication Communication is an essential part of human life. People have been created as social units and they are unable to live too long far from other human beings. During the centuries people used face-to-face type of communication with personal presence. The situation has changed with the development of the innovative technologies which has changed the style of communication.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Two Ways of Communication specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Now people can communicate without seeing each other or using the technologies to seeing the opponent but without being too close. Thus, nowadays people can experience both advantages and disadvantages of the modern technologies. Therefore the communication has become absolutely different, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of modern technology and face-to-face communication. It is obvious that the face-to-face communication is consider ed to be preferable for more people than the modern technology one. One of the main advantages of the face-to-face contact is the possibility to have a personal contact. People can shake hands and this is really important. Touch contact is important in communication as it gives an opportunity to feel a person better. Face-to-face contact gives more chances to understand a person correctly as while communication we pay much attention to mimics and gestures. However, one of the main disadvantages of the face to face contact is the inability to see the person immediately when one needs it, especially when the opponents or on different continents. The supporters of the modern technology communication do not have such problems as they are able to use different means for communication and be in touch any time and at any place they need. However, those who communicate over the telephone are unable to see the face of the opponent, to check his/her face impression and gestures which are usua lly important while discussing the problem. The communication via e-mails is even more complicated and hidden as people are unable even to understand the intonation of the voice. There are different ways for communication via web camera and many people consider it as the substitute of the face-to-face communication. However, this is not true as using the web camera people can see each other, but they are unable to feel each other which is really important. Still, the main advantage of the modern technology communication remains unchanged and it is considered as a strong argument in favor of this means.Advertising Looking for essay on communication strategies? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Conducting a comparison and contrast analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face and modern technology communication, it is possible to stress that each type should be used in accordance of the appropriateness of the situation. Thus, the emergency cases should be considered with the help of the modern technology communication as well as those when the situation doe not allow personal presence (for example, when relatives live far from you and you want to communicate with them). However, the serious business problems and other life conflicts or happy moments should be solved and supported only with face-to-face communication and personal presence. It is obvious that running business, those managers who deal with clients in their cabinet with the personal presence have more chances to succeed. In conclusion, it should be stated that each type of communication, either face-to-face or with the use of the modern technology should be used in an appropriate situation. Only in this case communication is going to be successful and pleasant for both opponents.

A Guide to Power Relationships in The Tempest

A Guide to Power Relationships in The Tempest The Tempest includes elements of both tragedy and comedy. It was written around 1610 and its generally considered Shakespeares final play as well as the last of his romance plays. The story is set on a remote island, where Prospero, the rightful Duke of Milan, schemes to restore his daughter Miranda to her proper place using manipulation and illusion. He conjures up a stormthe aptly named tempestto lure his power-hungry brother Antonio and the conspiring King Alonso to the island. In The Tempest, power and control are dominant themes. Many of the characters are locked into a power struggle for their freedom and for control of the island, forcing some characters (both good and evil) to abuse their power. For example: Prospero enslaves and treats Caliban badly.Antonio and Sebastian plot to kill Alonso.Antonio and Alonso aim to get rid of Prospero. The Tempest: Power Relationships In order to demonstrate power relationships in The Tempest, Shakespeare plays with master/servant relationships. For example, in the story Prospero is master to Ariel and Caliban although Prospero conducts each of these relationships differently, both Ariel and Caliban are acutely aware of their subservience. This leads Caliban to challenge Prospero’s control by taking on Stefano as his new master. However, in trying to escape one power relationship, Caliban quickly creates another when he persuades Stefano to murder Prospero by promising that he can marry Miranda and rule the island. Power relationships are inescapable in the play. Indeed, when Gonzalo envisages an equal world with no sovereignty, he is mocked. Sebastian reminds him that he would still be king and would therefore still have power – even if he did not exercise it. The Tempest: Colonization Many of the characters compete for colonial control of the island – a reflection of England’s colonial expansion in Shakespeare’s time. Sycorax, the original colonizer, came from Algiers with her son Caliban and reportedly performed evil deeds. When Prospero arrived on the island he enslaved its inhabitants and the power struggle for colonial control began - in turn raising issues of fairness in The Tempest Each character has a plan for the island if they were in charge: Caliban wants to â€Å"people the isle with Calibans, Stefano plans to murder his way into power, and Gonzalo imagines an idyllic mutually controlled society. Ironically, Gonzalo is one of the few characters in the play who is honest, loyal and kind throughout – in other words: a potential king. Shakespeare calls into question the right to rule by debating which qualities a good ruler should possess – and each of the characters with colonial ambitions embodies a particular aspect of the debate: Prospero: embodies the all-controlling, omnipresent rulerGonzalo: embodies the utopian visionaryCaliban: embodies the rightful native ruler Ultimately, Miranda and Ferdinand take control of the island, but what sort of rulers will they make? The audience is asked to question their suitability: Are they too weak to rule after we have seen them manipulated by Prospero and Alonso?